Nicole Kidman Rejects Baby Photo Deal

Image by wenn.com

Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban have reportedly rejected a multi million dollar offer to publish the first photos of their newborn daughter Sunday Rose.

According to the Australian newspaper The Sydney Morning Herald, "They don't think it's appropriate to make deals. They are still deciding how they feel about (it) - if and when they will release a photo at all. But they realize there is enormous interest from the public and they are grateful and appreciative of that.

"Nicole and Keith have been enjoying their first few days at home with their firstborn tot - Nicole is thinking about things like breastfeeding right now."

If they decide to release the photo, they said it they would release it for free. It's actually a better idea to make a deal with a magazine and donate the proceeds to charity, if they feel weird about selling the photos. Because if they don't, a paparazzi is the one who is going to bank off those first photos.

Get Nicole Kidman Breaking News!

Follow Hollyscoop on Twitter

Twitter / Facebook

Facebook / RSS

RSS

Nicole Kidman , Baby fever

Twitter

Facebook

Yahoo Buzz

MySpace

Digg

Paparazzi Causing Problems for Jessica...

Paris and Benji Still Going...

Check out more on Nicole Kidman

Penelope Cruz and Javier Bardem to Rebuild Schools in Haiti

Nicole Kidman Launches An Anti-Abuse Center

2010 People's Choice Awards Winners List

Report: Nicole Kidman Trying for Baby #2

Video: Nicole Kidman Refuses to Talk Scientology

Reader Comments

7:30AM 07/23/08 tam

I want to see a picture of Sunday Rose just as much as everyone else but I say let it up to Keith & Nicole when their ready to get one out we'll see it until then why keep worrying about it when its out we'll all see it at the same time.NO price is worth selling your child's picture.

9:42AM 07/14/08 annie

why is it such a bad thing to sell the pictures? the paparazzi is gonna end up getting those pictures so why not sell it before they get it.

9:14AM 07/14/08 avionne

That's good that they rejected the deal because the baby is a human being not an object you just put for sale. www.BehindTheLateShow.com

9:00AM 07/14/08 ruth

Who cares what these celebrities do??? It's their own business if they want to share their newborn babies with their fans. When we have our babies we send their hospital baby pics to all our family and friends. It's no different, only they get paid for it cause they are famous and we have to pay the hospital or some picture place for ours. Grow up people!!!

8:55AM 07/14/08 K

Oh and let us not forget (jenfraud)how the papz were able to determine that Pitt and Jolie were vacationing together in Africa only a month after his separation. Hmmm, who on earth could've notified the photogs that these two would be on another continent?? It's safe to bet that it reaked of Jolie making the call.

8:07AM 07/14/08 K

Jenfraud you are a meathead!Always bringing Jen into it even when no one else has. Hired PAPZ? OK, if that isn't the pot calling the kettle black I don't know what is. Your sick idol had an official of the town and her doctor hold up her child's birth certificate!!!!WTF is that all about? Talk about needing the extra attention. Don't even compare Kidman to Jolie - you know nothing about Kidman. Kidman has made it clear she wouldn't sell out the photos of her child unlike your starved for attention whore. Big difference in mentality, values and morals. You need to find better role models to admire!Go over to Dlisted and take a peak at what their saying over there ... it will make your crazy head spin!

7:29AM 07/14/08 Jenfraud

Unlike your pathetic C-LISTER idol Aniston, neither Jolie-Pitts or Kidman doesn't have HIRED PAPPS. By releasing the photo to a magazine, you eliminate the dangerous pursuit by the papps who wants the highest pay. Of course, being a fan of a sad woman who CALLS PAPPS whenever she boards the airplane or spreading her twat by the pool, you wouldn't understand it.

6:32AM 07/14/08 K

A better deal for who? You people are idiots (hollyscoop). How about these celebrities stop putting a freakin' price tag on their children's faces? Maybe when the public doesn't show an interest in this crap then the papz wouldn't make any money off of the photos. Nicole and Keith obviously still have their morals intact. Maybe the rest of the country should question their own. If you're that interested in looking at these celebrity spawns then to satisfy your curiousity , gaze through a mag at the grocery line check out but don't buy it. This way maybe this nonsense would stop when mag's realize people aren't buying into it.

6:28AM 07/14/08 Amy

If they want to give money to charity then they should take money out of their own pocket to do it instead of pimping their kid in a ridiculous photoshoot for the sake of charity. Is that supposed to be noble? Both of them have done enough for charity. They don't have to release a picture, it is not compulsory. And if a paparazzis is lucky enough to snap the kid then good on that paparazzi. It isn't as if the child will never be photographed. Celebs are so stupid, you attach the word "charity" to anything no matter how unethical and they will sell themselves for it. Good on Kidman and Urban, don't follow the trend.