|   
   |   
   |   

Debbie Rowe Entitled to Custody of Michael's Children

June 26, 2009
by: 
 Bridget Daly

One big question surrounding the death of Michael Jackson is where will his children go? According to TMZ, Debbie Rowe will get custody of them if she so chooses.

It’s been reported that Rowe gave up her parental rights to her children Paris and Michael Jr. during her custody battle with Jackson in 2005. Judge Stephen Lachs initially terminated her rights as a parent, but then reversed the decision.

TMZ spoke with Lance Spiegel, the lawyer who repped Jackson at the time. Spiegel says under the law, the Department of Children and Family Services must conduct a parental fitness investigation before parental rights are terminated and that didn't happen with Rowe.

So now, under California law, Rowe is now presumed to be the person who will get custody. The only way Rowe can be denied custody is if a court determines it would be "detrimental to the children."

Apparently if Rowe gets custody she will get "a huge amount of child support from Jackson's estate."

So chances are Debbie Rowe will be asking for full custody of Michael Jackson’s children. Do you think this is fair? Or should they go to someone else in Michael’s family?
Read More:
Michael Jackson Deaths
Check out more on Michael Jackson





Reader Comments
3:02PM 07/09/09 Dianne
Jana, the children don't even know Debbie Rowe. Leave them with the Jackson family. How cruel to take them away from the family they know. The Jacksons are a big family with lots of brothers and sisters, quite apart from Grandma.
2:58PM 07/09/09 Dianne
I think it would be far better to leave these little children with the Jackson family. The people they know best. Janet looked very fond of little Paris. It will be only a couple of years and they will be able to make up there own minds. Debbie Rowe dosen't look or sound like a good role model for them in my opinion. I think if you can give up children for money, that says a lot about you.I would say don't let her have them. UGH!
9:32AM 06/29/09 girly987
what kind of mother gives up parental rights... shes just after the money.. these kids need to stay with their family... aka aunts/uncles or grandparents.
0:52PM 06/27/09 StarryEyes87
maybe...after all she is their mother!
6:09PM 06/26/09 me623
Who knows. If anything it should be the childrens' choice. but then again greed will take over her and she may want to fight for them.
1:42PM 06/26/09 Banst
I think the kids should go with someone in the family. She has not been in their lives and it would not be fair to make the kids go live with someone they do not know. They are already having to deal with the sadness of losing their father...don't make them suffer anymore.
1:12PM 06/26/09 Ziggy2005
It's always the children that suffer for the parents selfishness. These children will have a tough time, adjusting wherever they go. They were never around people and were home schooled. May God protect and watch over them.
0:39PM 06/26/09 ktygirl
Maybe he left something in his Will as to where he would like his children be placed with.
11:52AM 06/26/09 Jana
I hope the kids go w/the mom... Michael's father was physically & emotionally abuse towards him children... I highly doubt Michael would want his father to raise his children
11:38AM 06/26/09 myholly787
I guess if she has had contact with them all along and has a relationship with them it would be proper. However, the third child is not hers...and would be seperated from the other two...that is not good. I hear that Katherine is in ill health herself...so who in the family they would go to is a bit of a mystery!
Leave a Comment
In order to post comments, please login or sign up.
Daily Celebrity Alerts!
X
Follow Hollyscoop on...