Make Hollyscoop your homepage
   |   
HS Mobile
   |   
   |   
June 04, 2008

Angelina To Have Natural Delivery

Angelina Jolie
Angelina Jolie is planning on having a natural childbirth. It hurts just thinking about it! Angie was planning on natural childbirth for Shiloh, and was disappointed when she had to have a C-section. So now she's praying things will go as planned and she'll be able to deliver the babies naturally.

Sources say Angie is already on bedrest, and there's no way she'll be carrying the twins to term. So they're all settled in their temporary home in France with a midwife and nurses standing by!

In related Brangelina news, bidding is up to $22 million for the baby pics!
Comments [ 72 ]
Related Stories

Comments
K
Natural childbirth? Give it a break! She already had a c-section, chances of vaginal birth after that are slim. Yes, some people can do it, however, she needs to PUSH two babies out of her NOT one. Here she goes again trying to play superwoman! This act is getting old. $22mil for photos of babies??? NO wonder Brad is out buying expensive shitty looking furniture! Free remodeling paid for by People mag!
Posted 6 months ago


Karen
K, I'm afraid that you are not well-informed at all. The chances of a VBAC are fantastic, especially since if I hear correctly, the reason for Shiloh's cesarean birth was that she was breech. Twins can certainly be born vaginally, regardless of previous cesarean surgery. I wish them the best of luck!
Posted 6 months ago


K
Karen - then why do you ALMOST never hear of it, if the chances are so "fantastic"?! Anyone I've ever known (and I know plenty of women) has always had a c-section for the 2nd and 3rd child after having the first c-section. Personally, I've done natural. In this day and age twins are rarely born vaginally! Maybe you need to stop using "one" example as the norm.
Posted 6 months ago


Princess Yeti
FYI. I am an L/D MSN RN. VBAC is not an option in todays time. Obstetricians will not assume the malpractice liability of allowing a former C-sect to labor naturally. Unless she finds a quack to dangerously attempt this, she will have another C-section and will just have to do as she has always done-fabricate a story about her "childbirth" experience. There was a time in the late 80's and 90's when they would allow an attempted VBAC but the practice is virtually unheard of now due to the mortality risk associated with uterine rupture-not only for the mother but also for the child (children). Whoever believes this ridiculous story probably also believes that Angelina was a virgin when she met Brad. For God sake people do your research before you attempt to argue. Also....K is absolutely correct. Due to the low gestational weight of twins, C-section is the preferred method of delivery for twins because they are almost ALWAYS preterm and it imposes less stress on already at-risk fetuses.
Posted 6 months ago


Kaaka
Shut the hell up all of you damn morons! You're all pathetic! hahahahaah
Posted 6 months ago


Renee
A VBAC with twins after a c-section previously? I don't think so Angie...
Posted 6 months ago


Susan
Actually, a good deal of highly respected evidence-based medical research is showing that VBAC is safer and a better option that a second c-section. The outcomes for both mothers and babies are significantly better with vbac than with cesarean surgery. Just because far too many U.S. obstetricians and hospitals are more worried about lawsuits than about what is truly best for women and babies does not mean that their refusal to "allow" vbac births in their practices or on the L & D units constitutes the best practice. As an RN with a master's degree in nursing, Princess Yeti should go to the library and read some of the most recent articles in the leading medical journals. Maybe that's why it's a good idea for Ms. Jolie to give birth in France with a midwife. In France, as in most of Western Europe, midwives provide the great majority of maternity services, calling in OBs as "consultants" on cases that they consider more complicated. And every one of those countries has better birth statistics than the U.S., which is only ranked 30th. The U.S. rate for cesarean surgery (which is major abdominal surgery, isn't it, Princess Yeti?) is over 31% and rising. In some cities and some hospitals, it is edging beyond 40%. Can it be possible that 40% of American women are unable to give birth vaginally, or is this merely one of the signs that something is wrong with the maternity care system in the U.S.? A physiologic birth (a term used by many today rather than "natural" birth), a vaginal birth, is simply what will happen if you don't interrupt the process. I extend my very best wishes to Ms. Jolie for a good birth and much happiness with the new members of her family.
Posted 6 months ago


Princess Yeti
Susan? You need to go and get an education in medicine, nursing or ANY form of education. Reading statistics on an internet site is NOT a form of education. In my field I HAVE done the research and case studies that absolutely support my above statement. Go ahead though and argue that I am SOOOO wrong. Reality is what it is whether you like it for poor Angie or not.
Posted 6 months ago


K
I think Susan has missed the point. The discussion is regarding having a VBAC while carrying TWINS. Princess Yeti is dead on right. It does cause a risk to the babies especially if born prematurely. But I also agree that the percentage of c-sections are ridiculous! We all know damn well that most of these celebrities schedule their delievery ahead of time before a potential problem has even occurred. Regardless of scientific evidence, common sense says NO vaginal birth with twins after a c-section. It's dangerous. Peiod.
Posted 6 months ago


alabama
It sure does sound like there are some people who are envious of Angelina. I believe we are supposed to have natural childbirth, the way God intended it to be. Times have changed to the point that is the rarity, either you have a C-section or they induce, both of which do cause harm to the baby. I say good luck the natural way and we should all be praying that Brad and Angelina have healthy beautiful babies that grow up to care about other people and cultures! God bless, Sweet Home Alabama
Posted 6 months ago


Elizabeth
As a family physician and the medical director of a birth center, I have reviewed the world literature on birth safety, especially with regards to attendant and place of birth. I was excited to find out that we FP's have better outcomes than OB's. The fact that midwives have better outcomes still has humbled me and motivated me to help create a system of maternity care that serves every woman, regardless of her beliefs, her ethnic background, her race, or her religion. Calling each other quacks or ridiculing each other's way of learning won't help develop that. Publicly criticizing the choices of a pregnant woman won't help either. Angelina, like every mother everywhere, deserves support and encouragement, especially since she's decided to do something that isn't mainstream, won't be easy, but will be in the best interest of her babies. VBAC's are becoming rarer and rarer in the US, the Centers for Disease Control is worried that the rising cesarean section rate may be contributing to the increasing rate of women who die in childbirth or soon after. Personally, and professionally, attending women who want VBAC is one of my greatest privileges. In my experience, women cared for by midwives can often take twins to term and give birth to two big babies, but they have to eat a lot and wisely. Yup, she's swimming upstream to go for a VBAC with twins, and i bet she would have a hard time trying to find a doctor in the US to support her enthusiastically. I hope she is in France because that's where she wants to be, not a part of a trend I'm hearing about--women who leave the US to get a VBAC. I wish her the best. What a courageous and strong woman. She'll be even stronger on the other side of this experience!
Posted 6 months ago


Lea
Twins come out one at a time, just like single babies. She's a strong, courageous woman who clearly knows what she wants and is willing to do what it takes to get it. She can do it!
Posted 6 months ago


another susan
i fully support the jolie-pitts decison to have a vbac with twins... current research in many repsected medical journals supports this. this is not about a dr's right to refuse because he is afraid or because the insurance company has told him he cant.. this is about the reproductive rights of a woman to make thoughtful choices about her own health care. it is not your or anyone elses choice to make,, i further support susan and elizabeths thoughts and ideas. i also support your decisions to disagree; but i do not support the unkind thoughtless way in which your opinions are meant to belittle others..what makes any of you assume that either one is uneducated.. in susan defense, i happen to know her educational background and susan for one does not need to answer to anyone for her very well informed intelligent opinion..this is 2008 and as you said you cant get all your information and education from the internet but it sure does help to expand the horizons of those who wish to see it all and decide for themselves. susan/midwife
Posted 6 months ago


VBAC Provider
I am a midwife who is able to provide the option of VBAC in an out of hospital setting along with the collaboration of an OB if necessary. I have been following Angelina Jolie's pregnancy with great interest. I am currently caring for a woman due with twins at about the same time as Ms. Jolie. And yes, she too is planning a VBAC with twins. This will be her second VBAC. Often at her prenatal appointments we have played the guessing game as of how much longer my patient will carry due to her excellent health, nutrition, and care from providers experienced in VBAC. How delighted we were to see that Ms. Jolie has been able to assemble a team that can provide optimal prenatal care and VBAC safely, if she chooses to pursue that safe and viable option. The substantial amount of scientific literature on VBAC is solid that uterine rupture rates are not statistically significant, although they can and do occur. What is also solid in the literature is that cesarean birth carries some serious long term risks for mothers and pregnancies that are very statistically significant, such as increased risk of miscarriage and stillbirth for subsequent pregnancies, along with a very dangerous condition called placenta accreta where the placenta grows into the uterine wall and can cause life threatening hemorrhage after a birth. The chances of accreta increase with the number of cesareans performed, so VBACing is a very safe and logical means of preventing a condition which can cause a woman to loose her uterus, and her future fertility. As well, there is a substantial and ever growing body of evidence that cesarean birth has long term implications in the rates of Asthma, and digestive issues for children, along with other immune system and GI problems. I do not see women being adequately counseled on these risks with the first cut. I think it is very, very important to remember that what is "typical' maternity care practice does not mean "normal" or "health promoting" maternity care. I do hope that the United States growing trend of an out of contol cesarean rate and it's attending long term morbidity for mothers and babies, is finally coming to a screeching halt as the US is forced to look at it's pitiful ranking in health measurements. I wish the best to Ms. Jolie's family, and all VBACing families in the United Sates who are often times forced to leave there towns or home states to find practitioners who are able to provide the evidenced based care that they deserve and should be able to receive in the United States.
Posted 6 months ago


Lauren
How fantastic!! Natural home birth is an incredible experience. Mine was life changing. It's great that she has the resources to get the birth she wants and deserves in France. Too bad most women in the USA don't have access to midwifery, homebirth, or VBACs of any kind (let alone twin vbac!). Best of luck to her and her family!
Posted 6 months ago


Rose
VBAC is safer than repeat c-section. EVEN WITH twins! I had a c-section with my first baby because he was breech. I had a VBAC with my daughter and am having another VBAC with this baby. The reason repeat c-sections are so high is because misinformation is given to women about the risks and benefits. C-sections are also more convenient for doctors. It's a sad state of affairs.
Posted 6 months ago


Danell
I had a homebirth VBAC with a 9 lb 6 oz baby. I'd do things exactly the same if I had 10 lb twins, because I value the integrity of my body and my uterus. I don't want it sliced and diced multiple times, endangering the present and future pregnancies. Twins run in my family, so it's something I've given great thought to. So while I'm surprised that Jolie would consider this (being from Hollywood), and won't really believe it until I see it, I think it's wonderful that she's considering it.
Posted 6 months ago


Jess
American Drs. don't like to perform VBACs and a lot refuse. Maybe that's why she doesn't have her children in America. She's strong and determined. I wish her well. I also don't believe that she would do anything to put herself or her children in danger. I bet she has a back up just in case:)
Posted 6 months ago


Sarah
I think it's wonderful she's going for a VBAC (if she really is), and the fact that she's in France to do it makes sense.... US doctors don't usually do it, which is really sad. The c-section rate in this country is extrememly high (31% the last I heard), but the infant mortality rate is also very high (second highest behind Latvia, in developed countries), which doesn't really make sense. It IS due to liability reasons, exactly what Princess Yeti said. But not because it's so dangerous, but because people in America sue for everything and anything. So doctors take the safe route and just do a repeat c-section. I HAVE heard of women having VBACs, it's not THAT unheard of, but it should be a lot higher of a percentage. If you keep synthetic drugs out of mom's system, the risk of uterine rupture is actually quite low. Now, add Cytotec, Pitocin, etc into the mix, and yes, the risk goes up. So keep the drugs out of mom and let nature take it's course!
Posted 6 months ago


Jenna
She doesn't have to "pray" that things go as planned... She has an excellent chance. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is actually FAR safer for all involved than is a planned repeat cesarean. Geez! Do some research before you write something so negligent of the facts. Her chances are even better if she doesn't step foot into a hospital. Yep, that's right... every intervention gives you a higher chance of something going wrong. If those interventions (pitocin, epidural, electronic fetal monitoring) aren't available (i.e. in an out of hospital setting), your body actually has a chance to do what it does best - birth your baby. Angelina Jolie is my hero for doing this in the face of media scrutiny. I'm wishing her many happy birthing vibes.
Posted 6 months ago


Sierra
Yay! I am so happy for her and I hope everything works out!!!
Posted 6 months ago


K.B.
Hip hip hooray, for Ms. Jolie!!! It is nice to see not everyone must be a slave to American birth trends, which are sad, misguided, and DANGEROUS! I am happy to see one very public figure has educated herself and is making decisions against the herd mentality! Maybe she can be a beacon to others who might not otherwise know that they have a better choice!
Posted 6 months ago


emily
Good for her! Natural childbirth is the most empowering experience ever! I hope she has the birth she wants. That is what we all deserve. It is nice to see a celebrity get it after the ridiculous "too posh too push" attitude that has warped Americans' minds. I say I am too powerful not to push! For all of you judging her w/ your lack of research, go watch "The Business of Being Born" already. It is time that the US wakes up to realize that we are in a crisis with our beliefs about childbirth. You go girl!
Posted 6 months ago


Shanna
Kudos to Angelina for doing what is best for those babies. I can not believe the ignorance people are spewing here. The chances of a VBAC (vaginal after cesarean) are great, especially in this day and age and since most cesarean cuts are horizontal). Natural birth is the healthiest on Mother and Baby and I am so glad she is being proactive about bringing those children into this world in the BEST way possible. I am so glad she is doing this in France. The US not only has the highest c-section rate in the industrialized world, we also have the highest infant mortality rate in it as well. Coincidence? I highly doubt it!
Posted 6 months ago


ec
Princessw Yeti, you need to step out of your medical minded brain and realize that in 90% of the cases childbirth is not an illness that needs medical intervention. It is medical intervention that has raised are C-section rates to 33%. The US spend double what any other country spends a year in maternity care. In a study of 13 developed counties, the US ranked LAST for neonatal mortality and infant mortality overall. We ranked 11th for postnatal mortality. That study came out of the July 26, 2000 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. It is people like you that are responsible for the sickened mindset of the average American woman who has been taught that she can't give birth w/o interventions in a hosp. In the majority of the other countries in the study, the midwife is the primary caregiver. The country that has the BEST rates uses midwifes and has at least 30% of their babies at home. The US has 1% of the babies born at home, so it is clear that this study is talking about babies born in our "safe" hospitals. The odds do not sound good to me. VBACs are entirely possible as are vaginal deliveries of twins. Go Angelina!
Posted 6 months ago


fyi
ec: step off asshole. I see we have alot of doctor wannabe's on this thread. stop praising this dopey woman! she's not the first woman to want natural childbirth!!she didn't even want bio kids and now she's on her kick about wanting a natural birth after already having a c-section. It may seem like a fine idea to do away with a c-section on your second pregnancy with twins - but it's not practical. It's a good thing she's in France cause that shit wouldn't fly in the US! she's pretty selfish anyone, so I can see how she wouldn't take into consideration the life of her twins. yeah the big risk taker that she is will do anything for an adrenaline rush!!!
Posted 6 months ago


Sarah
Yes, fyi, because major abdominal surgery is SO much less risky than a natural, vaginal birth. She is being SO selfish for choosing a safe way to birth her baby in a country MUCH safer than the US. How dare she choose the life of her babies over the politics of the US! {all that said with heavy sarcasm of course}
Posted 6 months ago


fyi
Sarah : So if a c-section is so much riskier, then why do the doctors opt to do more often than not? I would assume a risky surgery such as c-section could cause many malpractice suits for doctors that screw it up. Vaginal birth is obviously safer but not when you've already had a c-section and are carrying twins... you dumber than a stump b*tch! there's your sarcasm!
Posted 6 months ago


K.B.
Who's dumber than a stump...one who is "educated" from only one source with a VERY vested interest in their slanted teachings? Or a person who goes out of their way and spends time gathering and poring over information from ALL sources?! And then, why was it necessary to stoop to name calling? Intelligent, non-dumber-than-a-stump people don't need to resort to name calling because they have the goods to back up their arguments.
Posted 6 months ago


Freeda
Been there. Done that. My first child was born by emergency cesarean. My next at home with a midwife. Then twins born at home with a midwife. Everyone healthy and well. Couldn't imagine taking care of twins plus two older children after a cesarean (it was hard enough taking care of one after the cesarean). As far as educated I have a BA and I'm a Life & Health Insurance Fellow and at the time was an Internationally Certified Childbirth Educator. I also spoke with Dr. Michel Odent and Dr. Marsden Wagner about the risks and benefits of HBAC twin and both said there wasn't enough research available to able to use the law of large numbers. I know of one other mom who also did twin HBAC successfully so the more who do the more data we'll have. Best wishes to Angelina. I hope she gets off bed rest. I swam 30 minutes a day (15 min. and then a break before the next 15 min.) and went full term with my twins.
Posted 6 months ago


Brooke
Wow am I SICK of hearing how important it is to give birth naturally or vaginally. They should do what is safest for the babies. Who cares if the mother wants a "natural" experience. My sister has three kids and two are twins. After she had her first son C-Section, she thought about trying for this VBAC. The doctors explained the risks to the twins and she said "NO WAY" She decided her "experience" wasn't important because all that mattered was her little babies. Angelina is a selfish bitch to endanger her unborn children with the stress of childbirth when a C-Section would obviously be safer for them all. I think its all BS anyway cause I think she said all this to get people talking. That is how self centered she is.
Posted 6 months ago


K.B.
More often than not, vaginal and natural birth IS safest for babies...and for mothers. EVEN AFTER c-sections. This is one of the ONLY countries in the world where that isn't viewed and respected as solid fact because we have a completely BOGUS maternity care system!
Posted 6 months ago


fyi
K.B. Step off. You still haven't answered the question as to why doctors continue to do c-sections if vaginal birth is safer. If you know anything about US healthcare, you would know that c-sections allow a woman to stay in the hospital longer than a vaginal deliver. SO, since when has the healthcare system wanted to take on unnecessary expenses? I would think that the pressure would be on the doctors to do vaginal deliveries more often than not. Keep the costs down for health carriers. Apparently you're another one speaking from NO experience. Another idiot complaining about the US ! You don't like it, don't come here. If you live here already.... leave! Unless you have delivered a child in the US and out of the country as well - then you have no comparisons at all . Shut your pie hole and call it a day!
Posted 6 months ago


another susan
HEY fyi, FIRST OFF, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN EXACT SCIENCE ESPECIALLY MEDICINE...AT BEST IT IS SOMETIMES NOTHING BUT A GOOD GUESS... AND YES I AM YELLING.... DR'S AND THE HOSPITALS MAKE MORE MONEY... AND THEY GET HOME ON TIME. THEY DONT MISS DINNER WITH THEIR FAMILIES ! THEY GET PLAY GOD AND SHOW UP AS THE HERO AFTER THE FACT.. I COULD GO ON BUT WHY WASTE MY TIME ON SOMEONE WHO'S MIND IS CLOSED TO NEW IDEAS! WHEN YOU STOP QUESTIONING YOU STOP LEARNING AND WHEN YOU STOP LEARNING YOU MIGHT AS WELL BE DEAD.. IT MUST BE GREAT TO KNOW IT ALL AND BE SO SMART THAT ALL YOU CAN WRITE ARE COLORFUL EXPLITIVES. ME NOT STEPPING OFF.. have a great day!
Posted 6 months ago


Kara Jane
Woo hoo! Go Angelina! Maybe her highly publicized VBAC will wake up the women of America who have been making bad decisions when it comes to childbirth for years now. I had an amazing natural, out of hosipital birth in January. I'm sure Angelina's will be beautiful as well!
Posted 6 months ago


Another Brooke
First off, I can't stand Angelina Jolie. BUT, if she's for real about having a twin VBAC, MORE POWER TO HER!!! That's wonderful. If people really do their research, the FACTS do point to the safely of VBACing. It's that OB's face exorbitant costs for malpractice ins. if they offer VBACs. That's the reason no one offers them anymore. Ask some OB's if you don't believe me.
Posted 6 months ago


Susan
It's really a shame that FYI felt that he or she had to stoop to nasty expletives in this discussion and, in so doing, lowered the tone of discussion on this list. Why, you ask, FYI, do OBs do cesarean surgery? That's a good question and difficult to answer when one realizes that the national rate of cesarean surgery in the US is around 33% and, in some areas, as high as 50%. FYI, just think: how could THAT high a percentage be justified? How could one-half of all women at a particular hospital or in a particular town require surgery in order to give birth? Could there really be THAT many women having genuine problems delivering vaginally? The American Public Health Association, the World Health Organization, the national Coalition to Improve Maternity Services -- all these respected organizations think the rate is way too high. And, you see, all the recent medical literature has begun to recognize that the mortality and morbidity (that's death and injury) rates for both mother and baby are significantly HIGHER with cesarean surgery than with vaginal birth. Furthermore, one of the chief causes of prematurity in the U.S., we have recently learned, is the high rate of c-sections -- taking babies out of their mothers by surgery prior to 40 weeks gestation. The people responding on this list who are talking about the benefits of vbac and the risks of cesareans are not just making this up or selfishly seeking an "experience." Rather, we have read the medical literature and we know that major questions are being raised about the skyrocketing rate of cesarean surgery in this country today. ACOG's guidelines on VBAC are not based on solid medical evidence but, rather, seem to be chiefly concerned with using c-sections as a way to protect the OBs from getting sued, not necessarily to achieve an optimal outcome for the woman and baby. So, if Ms. Jolie chooses to give birth in France, where obstetricians and hospitals are not so quick to condemn vbac as you, FYI, it is perfectly understandable.
Posted 6 months ago


K.B.
Actually, fyi, I HAVE given birth in and outside of the U.S. Can you say the same? My first was born in the U.S. and my second in Finland. Guess where my experience AND my babies WELL-BEING was better?! By the way, I don't have a general complaint about the U.S. Never said I did. Born and raised here. See it's faults...still think it's better than most other places in the world. My complaint is about the maternity care situation here. I will answer your question...again...as I see it's been answered a fair few already. Doctors continue to do c-sections because it is convenient for them and because it makes them money. The difference between a natural, vaginal birth and a c-section is the difference between a Geo and a Porsche. Now...why don't YOU try to "step off" since you are the only one lacking civility.
Posted 6 months ago


sarah
I am happy to hear that Jolie and Pitt are well-informed enough on their childbirth options to have the twins born at home with midwives! A previous cesarean is not reason enough to dictate how future births will be, not even when twins are involved. Birth itself is not a medical condition. Families who give birth at home and/or have VBACs have often done more research on the subject of childbirth than the average consumer, or else they wouldn't have made the decision they did. I had a VBAC in a hospital, I had another baby at home after that.
Posted 6 months ago


Princess Yeti
There is a condition called CPD out there. Its very real and very dangerous for mother and child. All of you EXPERTS should KNOW what this is without having to look it up....that is IF you are for real. As for the mortality rates in the US involving childbirth, you people who are pro VBAC and hinged on the comparison studies involving infant mortality rates in the world, need to do your research or at least get an education that would clue you into the cause of higher mortality rates in the US. In this country, as much as I love it here, prenatal care is costly. So much so that a large percentage of women simply cannot afford the preventative care needed to sustain a healthy pregnancy and deliver a healthy baby. THAT is fact. Is has little to do with the C-Section issue. The mortality rate does not evolve from the surgical intervention of a Cesarean Section as a surgical procedure but it has largely to do with the complications that require a C-section such as; Gestational Diabetes, toxemia, fetal distress and yes, CPD. All incidents that could be dramatically decreased by adequate prenatal care. I have read every nasty remark on here. I find it ridiculous. Stick to the facts. Twins are delivered more safely in a sterile environment that inflicts the least amount of stress on their already compromised status. Yes a C-section is more invasive for the mother but what loving mother wouldn't sacrifice her own well being to ensure the comfort and safety of her child. Of course if a woman has already had a C-section, the risks for the mother and child nearly double. Angelina needs to get some counseling for this inferiority complex she has about have had her first child by C-section. After all the end goal of pregnancy is to give life to the unborn child you carry by whatever method necessary. Every healthy baby born is a success story whether by C-section or not.
Posted 6 months ago


Liz
GO FOR IT ANGIE!!!!!! Your a smart cookie, trust your body and have that VBAC! Women all over the world have natural vaginal births after c sections and they are just fine! The risks of c sections are GREATER than the risk of anything going wrong with a VBAC (which is like 1 to 3%) Good luck to you and yours, hope you have a happy delivery!
Posted 6 months ago


Liz
OH, and im having an all natural VBAC at home this October!!! Im super excited :) and ive known several moms who have sucessfully VBAC'd! It can be done and it IS done everyday!
Posted 6 months ago


kellie
I wish you all good luck with your VBAC but have any of considered why is it you feel so desperate to have it? Yall seem so obsessed with how your having the baby. Trust your body? that just sounds stupid. I think your all messed up in the head. Did yall get pregnant again becuase you wanted another baby? Or did you get pregnant again just to try have have a VBAC. Yall sound as weird as Angelina Jolie.
Posted 6 months ago


Tami
I think it is wonderful she is planning on a a VBAC! Unlike all the other stars that are planning their c-sections and tummy tucks. To each their own though. To a pp doctor's choose to do c-sections because they are faster and less time consuming. An OB is nothing more than surgeon trained to cut a baby out of a woman, that with out medical interventions (inductions being a big one) could deliver that baby naturally. There is only a small percent of women who truly for medical reasons need c-sections. To Kellie yes I guess you can call me weird..I chose to